rowland manthorpe dot com

I’ve got a piece on confidence and unemployment in the new issue of the RSA Journal. It starts with this little anecdote, which seems to me pretty representative:

Earlier this year, NatWest surveyed 9,000 young people about their salary expectations. The gloomy economic forecasts seem to have influenced the respondents, because their expected average earnings fell from last year’s estimate. Instead of saying they would be earning £70,000 by the time they were 35, they modestly anticipated £54,000. The average salary for a 35-year-old is £23,893.

The article was written in response to a piece on the recession by David Blanchflower, a former member of the Monetary Policy Committee. It’s well worth reading, especially if you need cheering down; you can also ask him a question. My question will being with a long, drawn-out scream.

Tweet This  Delicious This  Digg This 

I’ve just finished a piece on unemployment and confidence for the RSA Journal. While I was procrastinating, I read Eamon Duffy’s review of Keith Thomas’s new book in the LRB (subscriber protected). One passage made an interesting contrast to what I was writing:

People in our society think of unemployment as a curse, and derive much of their identity and satisfaction from work. But Thomas begins his chapter on work and vocation by exploring the conventional early modern view that work was at best a necessary evil.

For classical Greence the best life was one of leisure, “not idleness, of course, but virtuous activity of mind and body, involving no manual albour and unconstrained by the need to earn a living”. For ancient Christianity, work was the “primal curse”, inflicted on humankind as a punishment for the Fall.

Both classical and Christian orthodoxies informed early modern attitudes, so that the devoutly Protestant John Locke could assert on both counts that “labour for labour’s sake is against nature”. There would be no work in heaven.

Have a good weekend everyone.

Tweet This  Delicious This  Digg This